HMO vs single let: Which property strategy delivers better returns?

 
Ross McColl
·
8 min read
·
Jul 16, 2025
·
Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Choosing between an HMO vs single let strategy is one of the most important decisions a property investor in the UK can make. Both models offer different levels of return, risk, and management involvement. While single lets are known for their simplicity and stability, HMOs (Houses in Multiple Occupation) can deliver significantly higher rental yields if managed correctly.

Are HMOs worth it in the UK?

When comparing HMO vs single let investments, many landlords are drawn to the higher income potential of HMOs. But that doesn’t always mean they’re the better choice for everyone.

Higher rental yields

One of the most attractive aspects of HMOs is their potential for greater rental income. Instead of letting a property to one household, landlords rent out each room individually, which can significantly boost monthly cash flow. For example, a three-bed HMO in a student area could generate 50–75% more than the same house rented to a single family.

Increased management and maintenance

With more tenants come more responsibilities. HMOs require more hands-on management, dealing with multiple tenancy agreements, room inspections, and higher wear and tear. Utility bills are usually included in the rent, so landlords must also factor in fluctuating energy and internet costs.

Licencing and compliance requirements

HMOs are subject to specific licencing rules, which vary by local authority. Most HMOs with five or more tenants require a mandatory HMO licence, and all must comply with safety and space regulations, including fire doors, emergency lighting, and minimum room sizes.

Market demand for shared housing

In cities with large student populations, young professionals, or housing affordability issues, HMOs are in strong demand. Areas such as Leeds, Manchester, and Bristol continue to show high occupancy rates and competitive rental values for shared housing.

What is an HMO in the UK property market?

To fully understand HMO vs single let strategies, it’s essential to grasp what defines an HMO and how it operates within the UK’s housing system.

Definition of an HMO

An HMO (House in Multiple Occupation) is a property rented out by three or more people who are not from one household (i.e., not family) and who share facilities like the kitchen or bathroom. HMOs can be as small as a three-bed terrace or as large as a converted block of flats.

Types of HMOs

There are various forms of HMOs, including student houses, professional flatshares, and even large-scale commercial conversions. Some landlords also convert single lets into HMOs through internal reconfiguration, loft conversions, or extensions.

Legal obligations for HMO landlords

HMO landlords have additional responsibilities compared to single-let landlords. These include regular fire risk assessments, gas and electrical safety checks, and meeting local amenity standards. In some boroughs, landlords must also adhere to Article 4 restrictions, which require planning permission to convert a house into an HMO.

Financial considerations

While HMOs can bring in more income, they often cost more upfront due to higher refurb standards, fire safety upgrades, and potential planning constraints. Mortgage products can also be more limited, with specialist HMO lenders typically requiring larger deposits.

What is the rent-to-rent strategy in the UK?

The rent-to-rent strategy is often linked to HMO vs single let discussions, particularly for those entering the market without significant upfront capital.

How rent-to-rent works

Rent to rent is where an individual or company leases a property from a landlord (usually at a fixed monthly rate) and then sublets it as rooms to tenants, often converting it into an HMO. The operator profits from the difference between the guaranteed rent paid to the landlord and the total income received from tenants.

Legal structure and compliance

This model requires a commercial agreement and usually a company let agreement. Rent-to-rent operators must obtain the necessary HMO licences and comply with landlord duties, even though they don’t own the property. They are considered legally responsible for tenant safety and property standards.

Popularity in urban areas

Rent-to-rent has gained traction in cities like London, Birmingham, and Nottingham, where rental demand is high and landlords seek passive income. It allows newer investors to generate cash flow without needing a large mortgage deposit or taking ownership.

Risks and ethical concerns

While rent-to-rent can be profitable, it’s not without risk. Mismanagement, licensing breaches, or void periods can quickly erode profit margins. There’s also growing scrutiny over operators who convert homes without consent or over-occupy properties.

What are the HMO rules in the UK?

Understanding the HMO rules in the UK is crucial before pursuing this strategy, especially when comparing HMO vs single let returns and compliance risks.

Mandatory HMO licencing

A property must be licensed as an HMO if it’s rented to five or more individuals forming more than one household. This applies regardless of the number of storeys. Landlords must apply to their local authority, pay a fee, and undergo inspections.

Local HMO regulations and Article 4

Some councils require licences for smaller HMOs, known as "additional licensing". In designated Article 4 areas, you need planning permission to convert a single let into an HMO—even if it only has three tenants. This is particularly common in university towns and city centres.

Safety and space standards

Licenced HMOs must meet strict safety requirements: fire doors, smoke alarms in every room, emergency lighting, and adequate kitchen and bathroom facilities. Minimum room sizes are legally enforced (e.g. 6.51 sqm for a single bedroom).

Tenant rights and housing health checks

HMOs are subject to more frequent housing inspections by local authorities, and tenants in shared accommodation have robust rights. Failure to meet standards can result in civil penalties, rent repayment orders, or even banning orders for landlords.

Conclusion

When it comes to HMO vs single let, there is no one-size-fits-all answer. HMOs offer higher rental yields and can deliver strong returns, particularly in high-demand urban areas. However, they also require more hands-on management, carry greater legal responsibility, and come with higher setup costs. Single lets, on the other hand, are simpler to manage, more mortgage-friendly, and generally involve lower tenant turnover.

At Link Property, we help landlords choose the right strategy based on their financial goals, local market demand, and appetite for involvement. Whether you're considering converting to an HMO, expanding your single-let portfolio, or exploring rent to rent, we offer the expert guidance and management support you need.

Discover smarter letting strategies at Link Property – your trusted partner in profitable property investment.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is an HMO more profitable than a single let?

Yes, HMOs generally produce higher rental yields due to multiple income streams. However, they also involve higher costs and regulatory responsibilities.

Do I need planning permission for an HMO?

In Article 4 areas, yes—planning permission is required for any HMO conversion. Outside of these zones, planning may not be necessary for smaller HMOs but licensing still applies.

Can I convert my current single let into an HMO?

Yes, but you’ll need to ensure the property meets all HMO standards. This includes fire safety, minimum room sizes, and potentially obtaining a licence or planning approval.

Is rent-to-rent legal in the UK?

Yes, if done correctly with landlord permission and full compliance with HMO regulations. Operators must also fulfil all legal duties of a landlord.